Normative Theories

It means that an action Is ethical correct If the consequences of the action ar more fortunate than unfavorable to around people (Foot, 1985). In this case, the opposing take- all over on Fosters has a widespread operation on entire Foster organization, both(prenominal) external and internal stakeh overageders * Shareholders The shareholders of Foster allow for acquire high margin than ex modify their share on stock market. If the Gabrielle fatality to buy their shares, the partnership has to offer higher bold than the market value. As a result, the share testament benefit from the takeover. The caution If Gabrielle successfully takes over Foster, it may like bring its own stave members to wipe out the newfoundly acquired business. As a result, the lord Foster trouble may be dismissed or downgrade. Even they however control, original management may control themselves have to adjust to the practices in hallow to adapt to Gabrielle corporate culture. * Employe es Employees may be continueed a potbelly. Generally, when company controls change, lot of Jobs will be cut in the old company. Sometimes, every old staff will have to go.Other times, the new company will keep some employees in order to rain their own people. No matter what the decision on the employee, the takeover will have serious impact on the Foster employee morale. * Suppliers Gabrielle may change the suppliers, however, the impact extent will be depends on the new company policy. Generally, the impacts on suppliers are non serious. * Customers If the acquisition is successful, the new company may be diversify and cost-saving. The customers will get more nickel-and-dime(prenominal) beers than before. As result, the customers will benefit.But It does Impact the old company loyal customers. From the above analysis, Fosters shareholders and customers will benefit from the hostile takeover. The original management and employee will suffer. As the amounts of shareholders and cu stomer are obviously more than management and employee, the hostile takeover consequences are more favorable than unfavorable to most people. Therefore, It Is ethical habitation on teleological theory. Deontological ethical theories tension in general on complying with independent ethical rules or duties. Generally, there are serious theory and Justice theory.When go alonging hosiery duties, the actions are ethical (Brook, R. , 2007). When failing to follow these duties, the action is unethical. It does not focus on the consequence of action compared with teleological theory. In this case, the hostile takeover will not treat Fosters shareholders, management and employee equitably and fairly, It besides deontological theories. Virtue-based ethical theories did not emphasis on which rules the decision maker should follow, which are action-based theories. It primarily helps people to develop good reference point traits, such as kindness and generosity.